To search mask

ESMA warns firms and investors about risks arising from payment for order flow

ESMA is of the view that, in most cases, it is unlikely that the receipt of PFOF by firms from third parties would be compatible with MiFID II.

Topics

Continue reading with a PwC Plus-Subscription

  • verified Information source
  • daily updates
  • completely searchable articles (with refiner)
  • tailored alert

Free 30 days trial period

Register for the free PwC Plus account

Please log in to read the article

More details on PwC Plus

To search mask
To the top
FAQ/Feedback

© 2017 - 2024 PwC. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the PwC network and/or one or more of its member firms, each of which is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details.

This website contains copyright material of the IFRS® Foundation in respect of which all rights are reserved. Reproduced by PwC with the permission of the IFRS Foundation. No permission granted to third parties to reproduce or distribute. For full access to IFRS Standards and the work of the IFRS Foundation please visit www.ifrs.org.